Yardsticks for Evaluating ANC Governance since the end of Apartheid
The information following, paints a picture of the "ideal" characteristics and behaviour associated with each development phase. Once described this information will serve as yardsticks for evaluating ANC Governance since the end of Apartheid.
The description will start with Phase One, the Forming Phase. It will be followed by
information on Storming, Norming, Institutionalising and Performing, which will be covered as topics of future posts. Clear understanding of the theory underlying the evaluation, is crucial to interpreting the study findings.
A DESCRIPTION OF FORMING... The first criterion for evaluating the growth and development of the ANC Government
When a new
leader takes office or if the composition of a group changes significantly, a
process of forming or reformation, realignment and “start-up” is required. This
is a period of interdependency where members look at the leader and more senior
members for guidance and direction.
Deep-seated feelings
and behaviour during the forming phase include:
•
Members are aware that they could
be judged on first impressions and are hence careful of what they say and do.
•
Members feel that sound
relationships with the leader and influential members could positively
influence their career progression. They say and do things they sense would
show their undivided support.
•
Members support dominant
ideologies, ideas and philosophies to show unconditional commitment to the
organisation and its course.
•
Members are reluctant to express
their real opinions and views, and opt to conform. The leader’s ideas are
seldom confronted and challenged.
•
Members’ behaviour could be
describes as “obedient”, polite, with apparent openness to other’s ideas. At
this stage people tend to keep a low profile, avoid conflict and do not “rock
the boat”.
•
Supporting inclusiveness,
involvement, consultation and participation is regarded as the “right thing to
do”, leading to opening up communication channels with stakeholders and role
players.
The forming
phase is the most appropriate time for “team building”; clarifying expectations
and mobilising members behind a common vision, irrespective of party or group
differences. This includes developing or revisiting the constitution to provide
a basis for strategic directives e.g. policies, legislation and departmental
mandates.
Forming presents
favourable opportunities for nation building, which includes creating a feeling
with members of different groups that they are “interrelated” (part the same “family”)
and “interdependent” (needing each other); showing that everyone’s skills and
capabilities are appreciated. This includes “joining, stringing, moulding
together” or emotionally uniting people of different background behind the constitution.
There are
two equally important factors to any constitution, common vision or purpose
statement intended at providing long-term direction, namely:
•
Quality
(Q): Is the content relevant? Has it been researched properly?
•
Emotional
Commitment (EC): Are people psychologically connected to it? Do they
emotionally accept and support it?
A “good” constitution is characterised by a combination
of both High Quality (Q) and High Emotional Commitment (EC). Q x EC = Real
Purpose i.e. a purpose that can withstand the test of time. A lack of Emotional
Commitment to the Constitution (Q x ec) will minimise it resulting in little
value for the country and its people.
A constitution
reflects a system of fundamental laws and principles that prescribes the
nature, functions and limits of government. Emotional
Commitment hence implies:
• Officials
unconditionally accepting all fundamental constitutional laws and
principles, including the
Bill of Rights, norms, values, supporting ideologies and
culture they represent.
•
A state
of mind of putting Government’s goals above personal objectives.
• Officials
assuming accountability to pursue a common goal i.e. the provision of
excellent
services.
Failure to create this mindset, could activate, set in
motion or encourage personal objectives and channel energy and effort towards self-centred
behaviour.
The necessity to maintain the development of effective
and efficient directives, team building and nation building beyond the first
phase, is essential. Too often potential long-term benefits of forming are
minimised or nullified during the next phase.
•
KEY POINTS:
o
Any
new group or group, of which the composition has changed notably, requires
forming or reformation.
o The
forming period is characterised by deep-seated feelings and distinctive behaviour
such as visible support for dominant ideologies, ideas and philosophies.
o The
forming phase is the most appropriate time for team building.
o
Forming
also offers favourable opportunities for nation building. If not fully utilised
it could give rise to personal objectives and channel energy and effort towards
self-centred behaviour
How does ANC Governance live up to the characteristics set-out here?
( See future posts)